Anthony Strand ([info]zeppomarxist) wrote,
@ 2007-06-08 14:04:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
NFL SuperPro need not apply
For years, my brother Benjamin and I have had an ongoing feud over our preferred forms of entertainment. He's a huge sports fan and I'm a big ol' comic book nerd. Over the years, we've had dozens of arguments on the subject. For some reason, we both seem to be at our least articulate during these bouts, which are full of statements such as "Comics are for stupid idiots who like crappy crap!" and "Why do they even bother to show baseball on television?!" They invariably end in a draw.

If I'm being honest, I have to admit that the two have a lot of similarities. Comics fans and sports fans both spend ungodly amounts of time rehashing the past, which was far better than anything happening today. Both groups love to discuss the minutiae of specific events, whether that's the 1997 NBA Finals or the Crisis on Infinite Earths. When members of either group get together, they can often be heard determining the outcome of imaginary battles, be it Ruth vs. Clemens or Superman vs. Thor. Both groups also love to hear other people talk about the hobby, although ESPN commentary is certainly much higher profile than any comics blog. My brother Christopher even talks about the National League/American League split in exactly the same way I talk about the difference between DC and Marvel. We even sound equally ridiculous to people without any knowledge in the area.

In spite of all of that, I've long defended the inherent superiority of comics. I'll choose the worst ever issue of Green Lantern over the greatest game in the history of the NFL. Yesterday, I finally realized why.

It's as simple as this - sports fans and comic book fans have another thing in common. They both want to be just like their heroes. Every kid who watched the Bulls in the 1990s wanted to be Michael Jordan, and every kid who reads Action Comics wants to be Superman. Both forms of entertainment, at their cores, are about fans living vicariously through their favorite stars. It doesn't matter if that's the Colts or the Justice Society. The desire is the same.

And that's why comics have the edge. The comics fan has a far nobler wish. Sports fans want to emulate a group of people who make millions (millions!) of dollars per year contributing nothing to society. They have tremendous physical ability, and they get paid to waste it running around on a field. In spite of that, many of them act like spoiled five-year-olds when they don't get their way. To a sports fan, this is the ideal lifestyle.

Comics fans, on the other hand, strive to be like people who have been given tremendous powers and use them to help others. Superheroes don't get paid for their services. They do what they do simply because it's right. The life of a superhero is inherently selfless, while the life of a professional athlete is entirely selfish.

Now, I know what you're thinking - superheroes aren't real and athletes are. Well, that's exactly my point. Comics fans seek to achieve the impossible. Our bar is set so high that there is no way we can ever reach it. Sports fans are content to strive for the life of a fallible, standard human being.


(Post a new comment)


[info]prawnrr
2007-06-10 02:31 am UTC (link)
I dig it. I've never understood why it's considered acceptable to be obsessed with the minutiae of the history of the Dallas Cowboys, but it's hopelessly nerdy to be similarly knowledgeable about the Avengers.

"Want to be like their heroes" is an interesting theory. I like Marvel's Deadpool, so I guess that means I want to be a cynical, wise-cracking mercenary on a dubious path to redemption.

(Reply to this)


[info]tomh1138
2007-06-11 01:47 am UTC (link)
You and Ryan are both right on the money. There's an absurd double-standard in our world. Dressing up like Darth Maul and standing in line for a movie premiere = nerdy, painting your team's colors all over your face and sitting in freezing temperatures with your shirt off and screaming like a maniac = cool. I'm hard-pressed to identify the difference.

And I agree, I'd much rather read a fictional story about people fighting over the fate of the world than watch a true story about a bunch of grown men fighting over the fate of a worthless piece of plastic.

(Reply to this)


[info]johnnyparanoid
2007-06-11 03:10 pm UTC (link)
Wow, very well put. It's always bothered me that I am a self-proclaimed nerd for liking things like comics, yet someone equally obsessed with sports is a jock, the antonym of the nerd.

The only defense I can think of for the sports fan is that sports heroes are real, while costumed vigilantes and superhumans are fiction. We're basically emulating paper, while their goals of becoming a sports hero are attainable, if far-fetched.

And I've often wondered why our real-life "heroes" usually end up being sports stars or musicians. Kids love them, then some of them do something illegal and we wonder how they became "heroes" in the first place. Fictional people seem to be much better role models, even though we'll never get the chance to meet them.

(Reply to this)


[info]outofnapkins
2007-06-12 05:30 am UTC (link)
That's marvelous.

It all comes along with Mr. Horn's theories on fandom:
http://www.toughpigs.com/myweekeverything.htm#Thursday

In the days of my youth, I was a die-hard Yankees fan. But I think I wanted to be like the people in my family and the boys in my class who were baseball fans, not that I wanted to be a professional athlete myself.

And nowadays I'm something of a nerd with a geek streak. Maybe it's because I want to be more like you.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…